`Subjectivity' in newspaper reports on 'controversial' and `emotional' debates: an appraisal and controversy analysis
The notion of 'subjectivity' in news reports has been widely researched especially from the media perspective. However, 'subjectivity' is realized in various forms and the varied contexts and theoretical approaches offer new understanding of the notion. This article departs...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Routledge
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11408/1484 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The notion of 'subjectivity' in news reports has been widely researched especially from the
media perspective. However, 'subjectivity' is realized in various forms and the varied
contexts and theoretical approaches offer new understanding of the notion. This article
departs from such media theoretic perspectives to a discourse- linguistic approach and makes
an analysis of 'controversial' and 'emotional' reports of debates informed by the Appraisal
Theory (Martin and White 2005) and Controversy analysis (van Eemeren and Garssen 2008).
The research's focus is on how the Zimbabwean newspapers represent 'controversial' and
`emotional' debates balancing factuality, impartiality and objectivity. Stories from both
independent and state owned newspapers have been selected on the basis of their
`controversiality' and 'emotionality'. The study concludes that news reporting is directed at
aligning and disaligning readers with certain interpersonal meanings. Headlines of
newspapers have been argued to be attitudinal or 'emotionally charged'. It also concludes that
different language and cultural patterns have an impact on appraisal and argumentation in
news reporting. |
|---|