Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations

A field experiment was carried out at Agricultural Seed and Services Research Station in Zimbabwe to evaluate the response of maize inbred lines to different herbicide combinations. The trial was laid out in a 5×12 split plot design replicated three times. Herbicide combination was main plot factor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ignatius Chagonda, Nyasha Sakadzo, Kasirayi Makaza, Jimmy Shanangura, Tafadzwa T Haripo
Other Authors: Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Natural Resources Management and Agriculture, Midlands State University, P bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe.
Format: research article
Language:English
Published: Academic Journals (A J) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5610
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2018.13231
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905273083723776
author Ignatius Chagonda
Nyasha Sakadzo
Kasirayi Makaza
Jimmy Shanangura
Tafadzwa T Haripo
author2 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Natural Resources Management and Agriculture, Midlands State University, P bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe.
author_facet Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Natural Resources Management and Agriculture, Midlands State University, P bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe.
Ignatius Chagonda
Nyasha Sakadzo
Kasirayi Makaza
Jimmy Shanangura
Tafadzwa T Haripo
author_sort Ignatius Chagonda
collection DSpace
description A field experiment was carried out at Agricultural Seed and Services Research Station in Zimbabwe to evaluate the response of maize inbred lines to different herbicide combinations. The trial was laid out in a 5×12 split plot design replicated three times. Herbicide combination was main plot factor with five levels; Hand-hoeing;metolachlor+ atrazine;metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron; metolachlor+ atrazine+ halosulfuron and metolachlor +atrazine+ nicosulfuron+ halosulfuron. These combinations of herbicides have a broad spectrum activity and are able to control annual and perennial weeds with an inbred line as subplot factor with twelve levels; CML488, CML312, CML444, CML443, CML00001, CML395, CZL0610, CZL00003, CZL03014, L917 and N3.2.3.3. Data on germination, phytotoxicity, plant height, anthesis silking interval (ASI), ear height and grain yield were measured. There was a significant interaction (p<0.05) between herbicide combination and maize inbred line on germination, plant height (week 2 and 4), phytotoxicity, ASI, ear height and grain yield. There was no interaction (p>0.05) among herbicide combinations and maize inbred lines on plant height (week 12). That concluded metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron and metolachlor +atrazine+nicosulfuron+ halosulfuron herbicides had a major effect on susceptible maize inbred lines. Inbred lines were grouped into three categories in relation to European Weed Research Council (EWRC) score, efficacy and survival rate into; tolerant (CML312, CML444, CML443 and CML00003), medium resistant (CML395, CZL0610, NAW5885 and CZL00003) and susceptible (CML488, CZL03014, L917 and N3.2.3.3). Therefore, the study recommends not using metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron and metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron+ halosulfuron herbicide combinations on susceptible maize inbred lines.
format research article
id ir-11408-5610
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Academic Journals (A J)
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-56102023-05-05T06:44:57Z Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations Ignatius Chagonda Nyasha Sakadzo Kasirayi Makaza Jimmy Shanangura Tafadzwa T Haripo Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Natural Resources Management and Agriculture, Midlands State University, P bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Natural Resources Management and Agriculture, Midlands State University, P bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Natural Resources Management and Agriculture, Midlands State University, P bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe. Department of Soil and Plant Sciences. Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, Great Zimbabwe University, P.O. Box 1235 Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Department of Soil and Plant Sciences. Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, Great Zimbabwe University, P.O. Box 1235 Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Zea mays inbred lines herbicide combinations metolachlor atrazine nicosulfuron A field experiment was carried out at Agricultural Seed and Services Research Station in Zimbabwe to evaluate the response of maize inbred lines to different herbicide combinations. The trial was laid out in a 5×12 split plot design replicated three times. Herbicide combination was main plot factor with five levels; Hand-hoeing;metolachlor+ atrazine;metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron; metolachlor+ atrazine+ halosulfuron and metolachlor +atrazine+ nicosulfuron+ halosulfuron. These combinations of herbicides have a broad spectrum activity and are able to control annual and perennial weeds with an inbred line as subplot factor with twelve levels; CML488, CML312, CML444, CML443, CML00001, CML395, CZL0610, CZL00003, CZL03014, L917 and N3.2.3.3. Data on germination, phytotoxicity, plant height, anthesis silking interval (ASI), ear height and grain yield were measured. There was a significant interaction (p<0.05) between herbicide combination and maize inbred line on germination, plant height (week 2 and 4), phytotoxicity, ASI, ear height and grain yield. There was no interaction (p>0.05) among herbicide combinations and maize inbred lines on plant height (week 12). That concluded metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron and metolachlor +atrazine+nicosulfuron+ halosulfuron herbicides had a major effect on susceptible maize inbred lines. Inbred lines were grouped into three categories in relation to European Weed Research Council (EWRC) score, efficacy and survival rate into; tolerant (CML312, CML444, CML443 and CML00003), medium resistant (CML395, CZL0610, NAW5885 and CZL00003) and susceptible (CML488, CZL03014, L917 and N3.2.3.3). Therefore, the study recommends not using metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron and metolachlor+ atrazine+ nicosulfuron+ halosulfuron herbicide combinations on susceptible maize inbred lines. 13 31 1540 1550 2023-05-05T06:44:57Z 2023-05-05T06:44:57Z 2018-08-02 research article https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5610 https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2018.13231 en African Journal of Agricultural Research 1991-637X open Academic Journals (A J)
spellingShingle Zea mays
inbred lines
herbicide combinations
metolachlor
atrazine
nicosulfuron
Ignatius Chagonda
Nyasha Sakadzo
Kasirayi Makaza
Jimmy Shanangura
Tafadzwa T Haripo
Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations
title Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations
title_full Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations
title_fullStr Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations
title_full_unstemmed Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations
title_short Response of maize (Zea maysL) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations
title_sort response of maize (zea maysl) inbred lines to different herbicide combinations
topic Zea mays
inbred lines
herbicide combinations
metolachlor
atrazine
nicosulfuron
url https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5610
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2018.13231
work_keys_str_mv AT ignatiuschagonda responseofmaizezeamayslinbredlinestodifferentherbicidecombinations
AT nyashasakadzo responseofmaizezeamayslinbredlinestodifferentherbicidecombinations
AT kasirayimakaza responseofmaizezeamayslinbredlinestodifferentherbicidecombinations
AT jimmyshanangura responseofmaizezeamayslinbredlinestodifferentherbicidecombinations
AT tafadzwatharipo responseofmaizezeamayslinbredlinestodifferentherbicidecombinations