Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets

The quantity of land covered by various crops in a specific time span, referred to as a cropping pattern, dictates the level of agricultural production. However, retrieval of this information at a landscape scale can be challenging, especially when high spatial resolution imagery is not available. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aduvukha, Grace Rebecca, Abdel-Rahman, Elfatih M., Sichangi, Arthur W., Makokha, Godfrey Ouma, Landmann, Tobias, Mudereri, Bester Tawona, Tonnang, Henri E. Z., Dubois, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/530
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/4711
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905328785129472
author Aduvukha, Grace Rebecca
Abdel-Rahman, Elfatih M.
Sichangi, Arthur W.
Makokha, Godfrey Ouma
Landmann, Tobias
Mudereri, Bester Tawona
Tonnang, Henri E. Z.
Dubois, Thomas
author_facet Aduvukha, Grace Rebecca
Abdel-Rahman, Elfatih M.
Sichangi, Arthur W.
Makokha, Godfrey Ouma
Landmann, Tobias
Mudereri, Bester Tawona
Tonnang, Henri E. Z.
Dubois, Thomas
author_sort Aduvukha, Grace Rebecca
collection DSpace
description The quantity of land covered by various crops in a specific time span, referred to as a cropping pattern, dictates the level of agricultural production. However, retrieval of this information at a landscape scale can be challenging, especially when high spatial resolution imagery is not available. This study hypothesized that utilizing the unique advantages of multi-date and medium spatial resolution freely available Sentinel-2 (S2) reflectance bands (S2 bands), their vegetation indices (VIs) and vegetation phenology (VP) derivatives, and Sentinel-1 (S1) backscatter data would improve cropping pattern mapping in heterogeneous landscapes using robust machine learning algorithms, i.e., the guided regularized random forest (GRRF) for variable selection and the random forest (RF) for classification. This study’s objective was to map cropping patterns within three sub-counties in Murang’a County, a typical African smallholder heterogeneous farming area, in Kenya. Specifically, the performance of eight classification scenarios for mapping cropping patterns was compared, namely: (i) only S2 bands; (ii) S2 bands and VIs; (iii) S2 bands and VP; (iv) S2 bands and S1; (v) S2 bands, VIs, and S1; (vi) S2 bands, VP, and S1; (vii) S2 bands, VIs, and VP; and (viii) S2 bands, VIs, VP, and S1. Reference data of the dominant cropping patterns and non-croplands were collected. The GRRF algorithm was used to select the optimum variables in each scenario, and the RF was used to perform the classification for each scenario. The highest overall accuracy was 94.33% with Kappa of 0.93, attained using the GRRF-selected variables of scenario (v) S2, VIs, and S1. Furthermore, McNemar’s test of significance did not show significant differences (p 0.05) among the tested scenarios. This study demonstrated the strength of GRRF in selecting the most important variables and the synergetic advantage of S2 and S1 derivatives to accurately map cropping patterns in smallscale farming-dominated landscapes. Consequently, the cropping pattern mapping approach can be used in other sites of relatively similar agro-ecological conditions. Additionally, these results can be used to understand the sustainability of food systems and to model the abundance and spread of crop insect pests, diseases, and pollinators.
format Article
id ir-11408-4711
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-47112022-06-27T13:49:06Z Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets Aduvukha, Grace Rebecca Abdel-Rahman, Elfatih M. Sichangi, Arthur W. Makokha, Godfrey Ouma Landmann, Tobias Mudereri, Bester Tawona Tonnang, Henri E. Z. Dubois, Thomas agricultural productivity cropping pattern Kenya multi-data analysis The quantity of land covered by various crops in a specific time span, referred to as a cropping pattern, dictates the level of agricultural production. However, retrieval of this information at a landscape scale can be challenging, especially when high spatial resolution imagery is not available. This study hypothesized that utilizing the unique advantages of multi-date and medium spatial resolution freely available Sentinel-2 (S2) reflectance bands (S2 bands), their vegetation indices (VIs) and vegetation phenology (VP) derivatives, and Sentinel-1 (S1) backscatter data would improve cropping pattern mapping in heterogeneous landscapes using robust machine learning algorithms, i.e., the guided regularized random forest (GRRF) for variable selection and the random forest (RF) for classification. This study’s objective was to map cropping patterns within three sub-counties in Murang’a County, a typical African smallholder heterogeneous farming area, in Kenya. Specifically, the performance of eight classification scenarios for mapping cropping patterns was compared, namely: (i) only S2 bands; (ii) S2 bands and VIs; (iii) S2 bands and VP; (iv) S2 bands and S1; (v) S2 bands, VIs, and S1; (vi) S2 bands, VP, and S1; (vii) S2 bands, VIs, and VP; and (viii) S2 bands, VIs, VP, and S1. Reference data of the dominant cropping patterns and non-croplands were collected. The GRRF algorithm was used to select the optimum variables in each scenario, and the RF was used to perform the classification for each scenario. The highest overall accuracy was 94.33% with Kappa of 0.93, attained using the GRRF-selected variables of scenario (v) S2, VIs, and S1. Furthermore, McNemar’s test of significance did not show significant differences (p 0.05) among the tested scenarios. This study demonstrated the strength of GRRF in selecting the most important variables and the synergetic advantage of S2 and S1 derivatives to accurately map cropping patterns in smallscale farming-dominated landscapes. Consequently, the cropping pattern mapping approach can be used in other sites of relatively similar agro-ecological conditions. Additionally, these results can be used to understand the sustainability of food systems and to model the abundance and spread of crop insect pests, diseases, and pollinators. 2022-03-18T08:38:26Z 2022-03-18T08:38:26Z 2021 Article 2077-0472 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/530 http://hdl.handle.net/11408/4711 en Agriculture (Switzerland);Vol.11 , Iss.6 open MDPI
spellingShingle agricultural productivity
cropping pattern
Kenya
multi-data analysis
Aduvukha, Grace Rebecca
Abdel-Rahman, Elfatih M.
Sichangi, Arthur W.
Makokha, Godfrey Ouma
Landmann, Tobias
Mudereri, Bester Tawona
Tonnang, Henri E. Z.
Dubois, Thomas
Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets
title Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets
title_full Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets
title_fullStr Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets
title_full_unstemmed Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets
title_short Cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets
title_sort cropping pattern mapping in an agro-natural heterogeneous landscape using sentinel-2 and sentinel-1 satellite datasets
topic agricultural productivity
cropping pattern
Kenya
multi-data analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/530
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/4711
work_keys_str_mv AT aduvukhagracerebecca croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets
AT abdelrahmanelfatihm croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets
AT sichangiarthurw croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets
AT makokhagodfreyouma croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets
AT landmanntobias croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets
AT mudereribestertawona croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets
AT tonnanghenriez croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets
AT duboisthomas croppingpatternmappinginanagronaturalheterogeneouslandscapeusingsentinel2andsentinel1satellitedatasets