Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows

A study was conducted to compare conception rates in 71 Tuli and 86 Afrikander beef cattle bred using either artificial insemination (AI) or the bull. Animals were bred using either artificial insemination or natural service at Matopos Research Station. Animals were grouped into three groups of heif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Washaya, S, Tavirimirwa, B, Dube, S, Sisito, G, Tambo, G, Ncube, S, Zhakata, X
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Netherlands 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31065932/
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/4353
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905278163025920
author Washaya, S
Tavirimirwa, B
Dube, S
Sisito, G
Tambo, G
Ncube, S
Zhakata, X
author_facet Washaya, S
Tavirimirwa, B
Dube, S
Sisito, G
Tambo, G
Ncube, S
Zhakata, X
author_sort Washaya, S
collection DSpace
description A study was conducted to compare conception rates in 71 Tuli and 86 Afrikander beef cattle bred using either artificial insemination (AI) or the bull. Animals were bred using either artificial insemination or natural service at Matopos Research Station. Animals were grouped into three groups of heifers (parity 0; P0), second calvers (parity 1; P1) and mature cows (parity 2; P2) before being randomly assigned to one of the two breeding methods. A binary logistic regression was used for statistical analysis where breeding method (AI vs natural service) was the treatment factor and conception rate was the measured response while breed, parity and last calving date were non-treatment factors. No significant differences were observed in conception rates between breeds (P > 0.05). However, the method of breeding animals, parity and calving interval affected (P < 0.05) conception rates. The breeding method, parity and calving interval had a positive Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficients to conception. More animals were pregnant when AI (77.6%) was used compared with natural mating (56.79%). Conception rates were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in C1 compared with C2 cattle. The odds ratio for breeding method and parity are positive and significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the study confirms that artificial inseminated animals had similar conception rates to naturally serviced animals for both Tuli and Afrikander breeds. As such, artificial insemination technology can be used to complement or substitute natural service in indigenous cattle's of Zimbabwe.
format Article
id ir-11408-4353
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-43532022-06-27T13:49:06Z Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows Washaya, S Tavirimirwa, B Dube, S Sisito, G Tambo, G Ncube, S Zhakata, X Indigenous cattle Breeding method Pregnancy rates Smallholder A study was conducted to compare conception rates in 71 Tuli and 86 Afrikander beef cattle bred using either artificial insemination (AI) or the bull. Animals were bred using either artificial insemination or natural service at Matopos Research Station. Animals were grouped into three groups of heifers (parity 0; P0), second calvers (parity 1; P1) and mature cows (parity 2; P2) before being randomly assigned to one of the two breeding methods. A binary logistic regression was used for statistical analysis where breeding method (AI vs natural service) was the treatment factor and conception rate was the measured response while breed, parity and last calving date were non-treatment factors. No significant differences were observed in conception rates between breeds (P > 0.05). However, the method of breeding animals, parity and calving interval affected (P < 0.05) conception rates. The breeding method, parity and calving interval had a positive Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficients to conception. More animals were pregnant when AI (77.6%) was used compared with natural mating (56.79%). Conception rates were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in C1 compared with C2 cattle. The odds ratio for breeding method and parity are positive and significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the study confirms that artificial inseminated animals had similar conception rates to naturally serviced animals for both Tuli and Afrikander breeds. As such, artificial insemination technology can be used to complement or substitute natural service in indigenous cattle's of Zimbabwe. 2021-06-04T08:01:21Z 2021-06-04T08:01:21Z 2019 Article 1573-7438 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31065932/ http://hdl.handle.net/11408/4353 en Tropical Animal Health and Production;Vol.45 ; No.6 open Springer Netherlands
spellingShingle Indigenous cattle
Breeding method
Pregnancy rates
Smallholder
Washaya, S
Tavirimirwa, B
Dube, S
Sisito, G
Tambo, G
Ncube, S
Zhakata, X
Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows
title Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows
title_full Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows
title_fullStr Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows
title_short Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows
title_sort reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows
topic Indigenous cattle
Breeding method
Pregnancy rates
Smallholder
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31065932/
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/4353
work_keys_str_mv AT washayas reproductiveefficiencyinnaturallyservicedandartificiallyinseminatedbeefcows
AT tavirimirwab reproductiveefficiencyinnaturallyservicedandartificiallyinseminatedbeefcows
AT dubes reproductiveefficiencyinnaturallyservicedandartificiallyinseminatedbeefcows
AT sisitog reproductiveefficiencyinnaturallyservicedandartificiallyinseminatedbeefcows
AT tambog reproductiveefficiencyinnaturallyservicedandartificiallyinseminatedbeefcows
AT ncubes reproductiveefficiencyinnaturallyservicedandartificiallyinseminatedbeefcows
AT zhakatax reproductiveefficiencyinnaturallyservicedandartificiallyinseminatedbeefcows