Zimbabwean plantation workers conditions of work and service, a case of manicaland province.
The colonial state the world over has been characterized as brutal and exploitative in that it denied the indigenous peoples from benefiting from their resources. In the case of Zimbabwe in particular, the settlers during the greater part of the first half of the 20th century took recourse to primit...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Midlands State University
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11408/392 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The colonial state the world over has been characterized as brutal and exploitative in that it denied the indigenous peoples from benefiting from their resources. In the case of Zimbabwe in particular, the settlers during the greater part of the first half of the 20th century took recourse to primitive accumulation of wealth as the hoped for Eldorado's failed to materialize. Following the failure of the "Second Rand" by the turn of the century, the settlers turned to agriculture. This resulted in a well calculated and managed process of land expropriation
from the indigenous Africans. Thus agriculture became the backbone and corner stone of
the colonial economy. African conditions of work and service in this sector have been regarded
as the worst compared to other sectors and this history is well documented. The nationalist
movements in their struggle against the colonial state pledged to improve the conditions of
farm and plantation workers should they gain power. Was this promise fulfilled? This is
the major question this paper grapples with. Basing on evidence gathered from plantations
in Manicaland, it is argued in here that conditions of plantation as well as other farm
workers have remained pathetic. |
|---|