Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe developed smallholder irrigated agriculture initially as a famine relief strategy and later towards alleviation of poverty, employment creation and cushioning the country’s semi arid periodic droughts since the beginning of the twentieth century. The study evaluated the effect of smallhol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chivizhe, Joseph, B., Mugabe, Francis T., Kadigi, Reuben M.J.
Language:English
Published: Gujarat Journal of Extension Education 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3863
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905665627586560
author Chivizhe, Joseph, B.
Mugabe, Francis T.
Kadigi, Reuben M.J.
author_facet Chivizhe, Joseph, B.
Mugabe, Francis T.
Kadigi, Reuben M.J.
author_sort Chivizhe, Joseph, B.
collection DSpace
description Zimbabwe developed smallholder irrigated agriculture initially as a famine relief strategy and later towards alleviation of poverty, employment creation and cushioning the country’s semi arid periodic droughts since the beginning of the twentieth century. The study evaluated the effect of smallholder irrigated agriculture on income distribution. A multistage sampling technique was used to select the two study areas of Ngondoma and HamaMavhaire comprising 71and 56 sample respondents respectively. A researcher administered questionnaire for collection of cross-sectional data. HamaMavhaire results show negative disaggregated income (USD 335.38) for the bottom quintile with the top quintile earning 64.07% of total income. Ngondoma results show earnings of 2.94%, and 58.7% of the income earned by the bottom and top quintiles respectively. The finding shows a Gini coefficient of 0.624 for HamaMavhaire and 0.516 for Ngondoma indicating greater income inequality in HamaMavhaire. Disaggregation of total income using the coefficient of variation and the Gini coefficient shows crop income and transfers being consistently inequality reducing sources, while self employment was inequality increasing. Livestock and non-farm income behaved differently being inequality reducing sources under the Gini coefficient and inequality increasing under the Coefficient of variation. However literature recommends Coefficient of variation than Gini coefficient as more meaningful measure.
id ir-11408-3863
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Gujarat Journal of Extension Education
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-38632022-06-27T13:49:06Z Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe Chivizhe, Joseph, B. Mugabe, Francis T. Kadigi, Reuben M.J. smallholder irrigation income inequality Gini coefficient coefficient of variation, Zimbabwe developed smallholder irrigated agriculture initially as a famine relief strategy and later towards alleviation of poverty, employment creation and cushioning the country’s semi arid periodic droughts since the beginning of the twentieth century. The study evaluated the effect of smallholder irrigated agriculture on income distribution. A multistage sampling technique was used to select the two study areas of Ngondoma and HamaMavhaire comprising 71and 56 sample respondents respectively. A researcher administered questionnaire for collection of cross-sectional data. HamaMavhaire results show negative disaggregated income (USD 335.38) for the bottom quintile with the top quintile earning 64.07% of total income. Ngondoma results show earnings of 2.94%, and 58.7% of the income earned by the bottom and top quintiles respectively. The finding shows a Gini coefficient of 0.624 for HamaMavhaire and 0.516 for Ngondoma indicating greater income inequality in HamaMavhaire. Disaggregation of total income using the coefficient of variation and the Gini coefficient shows crop income and transfers being consistently inequality reducing sources, while self employment was inequality increasing. Livestock and non-farm income behaved differently being inequality reducing sources under the Gini coefficient and inequality increasing under the Coefficient of variation. However literature recommends Coefficient of variation than Gini coefficient as more meaningful measure. 2020-11-17T13:34:24Z 2020-11-17T13:34:24Z 2018 2322-0678 http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3863 en Gujarat Journal of Extension Education; open Gujarat Journal of Extension Education
spellingShingle smallholder irrigation
income inequality
Gini coefficient
coefficient of variation,
Chivizhe, Joseph, B.
Mugabe, Francis T.
Kadigi, Reuben M.J.
Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe
title Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe
title_full Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe
title_short Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe
title_sort income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of hamamavhaire and ngondoma irrigation schemes in the midlands province of zimbabwe
topic smallholder irrigation
income inequality
Gini coefficient
coefficient of variation,
url http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3863
work_keys_str_mv AT chivizhejosephb incomeinequalityamongthesmallholderirrigationfarmersthecaseofhamamavhaireandngondomairrigationschemesinthemidlandsprovinceofzimbabwe
AT mugabefrancist incomeinequalityamongthesmallholderirrigationfarmersthecaseofhamamavhaireandngondomairrigationschemesinthemidlandsprovinceofzimbabwe
AT kadigireubenmj incomeinequalityamongthesmallholderirrigationfarmersthecaseofhamamavhaireandngondomairrigationschemesinthemidlandsprovinceofzimbabwe