Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe

Wetland degradation and loss has persisted in developing countries due to existence of poor institutional frameworks supporting wetland governance. Therefore, wetland ecosystem services that support the livelihoods of most subsistence populations in rural areas are concomitantly lost. This paper exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marambanyika, Thomas, Beckedahl, Heinz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LAR Centre Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.socialsciencejournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/71
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3453
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905268570652672
author Marambanyika, Thomas
Beckedahl, Heinz
author_facet Marambanyika, Thomas
Beckedahl, Heinz
author_sort Marambanyika, Thomas
collection DSpace
description Wetland degradation and loss has persisted in developing countries due to existence of poor institutional frameworks supporting wetland governance. Therefore, wetland ecosystem services that support the livelihoods of most subsistence populations in rural areas are concomitantly lost. This paper explores the nature and consequences of institutional arrangements governing wetland access, utilization and conservation in six communal wetlands in Zimbabwe. Data were collected through a household survey targeting one hundred and twenty-three household heads, sixty teenagers and key informant interviews. The results of the study indicate a complex, multi-institutional involvement and the roles and relationship of participating institutions often compromise wetland resources conservation as a result of conflicts, confusion and tensions exacerbated by divergent motives. There is no homogeny in the number of institutions determining utilization at each wetland nor their degree of influence on management decisions; a situation reflecting inconsistency in existing institutional structure at communal level. Given the proximity of traditional leaders and wetland committees to the people and wetlands and the poor participation of government agencies, an institutional structure which places local institutions at the core of the governance system should be formulated. This should be complemented by a clear framework which promotes co-ordination of institutional roles and clarification of their relationships in order to minimize discord in execution of their duties; a situation that currently contributes to degradation of wetland ecosystems. The necessary policy and legal framework to support such institutional framework should be put in place and resources for its operations made available.
format Article
id ir-11408-3453
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher LAR Centre Press
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-34532022-06-27T13:49:06Z Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe Marambanyika, Thomas Beckedahl, Heinz Local Communities Wetland Governance Wetland Management Stakeholder participation Zimbabwe Wetland degradation and loss has persisted in developing countries due to existence of poor institutional frameworks supporting wetland governance. Therefore, wetland ecosystem services that support the livelihoods of most subsistence populations in rural areas are concomitantly lost. This paper explores the nature and consequences of institutional arrangements governing wetland access, utilization and conservation in six communal wetlands in Zimbabwe. Data were collected through a household survey targeting one hundred and twenty-three household heads, sixty teenagers and key informant interviews. The results of the study indicate a complex, multi-institutional involvement and the roles and relationship of participating institutions often compromise wetland resources conservation as a result of conflicts, confusion and tensions exacerbated by divergent motives. There is no homogeny in the number of institutions determining utilization at each wetland nor their degree of influence on management decisions; a situation reflecting inconsistency in existing institutional structure at communal level. Given the proximity of traditional leaders and wetland committees to the people and wetlands and the poor participation of government agencies, an institutional structure which places local institutions at the core of the governance system should be formulated. This should be complemented by a clear framework which promotes co-ordination of institutional roles and clarification of their relationships in order to minimize discord in execution of their duties; a situation that currently contributes to degradation of wetland ecosystems. The necessary policy and legal framework to support such institutional framework should be put in place and resources for its operations made available. 2019-02-15T14:33:47Z 2019-02-15T14:33:47Z 2017 Article 2378-8569 https://www.socialsciencejournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/71 http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3453 en Review of Social Sciences;Vol. 02, No. 01: p. 1-16 open LAR Centre Press
spellingShingle Local Communities
Wetland Governance
Wetland Management
Stakeholder participation
Zimbabwe
Marambanyika, Thomas
Beckedahl, Heinz
Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe
title Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe
title_full Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe
title_short Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe
title_sort institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of zimbabwe
topic Local Communities
Wetland Governance
Wetland Management
Stakeholder participation
Zimbabwe
url https://www.socialsciencejournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/71
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3453
work_keys_str_mv AT marambanyikathomas institutionalarrangementsgoverningwetlandutilizationandconservationincommunalareasofzimbabwe
AT beckedahlheinz institutionalarrangementsgoverningwetlandutilizationandconservationincommunalareasofzimbabwe