An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe

The Hargreaves, Bristow – Campbell (B­C) and Donatelli – Campbell (C­D) solar radiation estimation models were evaluated to establish their performances in the semi arid climate of Midlands Zimbabwe. The models were also calibrated to attain the site specific empirical coefficients so as to improve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zirebwa, F.S., Kapenzi, A, Makuvaro, V., Sammie, B., Madanzi, Tendai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Midlands State University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11408/1822
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905213136633856
author Zirebwa, F.S.
Kapenzi, A,
Makuvaro, V.
Sammie, B.
Madanzi, Tendai
author_facet Zirebwa, F.S.
Kapenzi, A,
Makuvaro, V.
Sammie, B.
Madanzi, Tendai
author_sort Zirebwa, F.S.
collection DSpace
description The Hargreaves, Bristow – Campbell (B­C) and Donatelli – Campbell (C­D) solar radiation estimation models were evaluated to establish their performances in the semi arid climate of Midlands Zimbabwe. The models were also calibrated to attain the site specific empirical coefficients so as to improve in terms of prediction accuracy. To achieve this evaluation, daily incoming solar radiation, minimum temperature and maximum temperature were measured for a year (July 2013 to June 2014) at two sites (Mlezu and Mvuma) in Midlands Zimbabwe. The temperatures were used to calculate daily solar radiation for the Hargreaves, B­C and C­D models. The measured solar radiation at both sites was used to evaluate the performances of the models using the Mean Absolute Prediction error (Err), Model Efficiency (EF), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Bias and coefficient of determination (R2). All models were calibrated using linear regression equations. The B­C model performed better than the other models overall. The least performer was the C­D model. The B­C model had the lowest Err (17.85 % and 16.31 %), RMSE (3.725 MJm­2day­1 and 3.486 MJm­2day­1) and Bias (2.501 MJm­2day­1 and 1.281 MJm­2day­1) values at both sites. The Hargreaves and C­D models’ performances were almost similar at both sites. The Bias levels were between 3 MJm­2day­1 and 4 MJm­2day­1, and the RMSE values were slightly above 4 MJm­2day­1. The EFs of all the models were acceptable since they were > 0. Calibration improved the performances of all the models. The EF values of all the models ranged between 0.55 and 0.7, the Err reduced to between 11 % and 16 % and the Bias was reduced to < 0.5 MJ m­2 day­1 for the Hargreaves and B­C models. The Bias was however still higher for the C­D model (~ 2 MJ m­2 day­1). The average site specific “K” coefficient of the Hargreaves model, the “a” coefficient of the B­C model and the CD_b coefficient of the C­D model were found to be 0.1361, 6.274 and 0.1895. Solar radiation estimation models are supposed to be calibrated before use for improved prediction accuracy.
format Article
id ir-11408-1822
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Midlands State University
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-18222022-06-27T13:49:06Z An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe Zirebwa, F.S. Kapenzi, A, Makuvaro, V. Sammie, B. Madanzi, Tendai Solar radiation, Bristow – Campbell, Donatelli – Campbell, Hargreaves, Model Evaluation The Hargreaves, Bristow – Campbell (B­C) and Donatelli – Campbell (C­D) solar radiation estimation models were evaluated to establish their performances in the semi arid climate of Midlands Zimbabwe. The models were also calibrated to attain the site specific empirical coefficients so as to improve in terms of prediction accuracy. To achieve this evaluation, daily incoming solar radiation, minimum temperature and maximum temperature were measured for a year (July 2013 to June 2014) at two sites (Mlezu and Mvuma) in Midlands Zimbabwe. The temperatures were used to calculate daily solar radiation for the Hargreaves, B­C and C­D models. The measured solar radiation at both sites was used to evaluate the performances of the models using the Mean Absolute Prediction error (Err), Model Efficiency (EF), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Bias and coefficient of determination (R2). All models were calibrated using linear regression equations. The B­C model performed better than the other models overall. The least performer was the C­D model. The B­C model had the lowest Err (17.85 % and 16.31 %), RMSE (3.725 MJm­2day­1 and 3.486 MJm­2day­1) and Bias (2.501 MJm­2day­1 and 1.281 MJm­2day­1) values at both sites. The Hargreaves and C­D models’ performances were almost similar at both sites. The Bias levels were between 3 MJm­2day­1 and 4 MJm­2day­1, and the RMSE values were slightly above 4 MJm­2day­1. The EFs of all the models were acceptable since they were > 0. Calibration improved the performances of all the models. The EF values of all the models ranged between 0.55 and 0.7, the Err reduced to between 11 % and 16 % and the Bias was reduced to < 0.5 MJ m­2 day­1 for the Hargreaves and B­C models. The Bias was however still higher for the C­D model (~ 2 MJ m­2 day­1). The average site specific “K” coefficient of the Hargreaves model, the “a” coefficient of the B­C model and the CD_b coefficient of the C­D model were found to be 0.1361, 6.274 and 0.1895. Solar radiation estimation models are supposed to be calibrated before use for improved prediction accuracy. 2016-10-04T06:56:54Z 2016-10-04T06:56:54Z 2015 Article http://hdl.handle.net/11408/1822 en Midlands State University Journal of Science, Agriculture and Technology;Special edition; p. 44-55 open Midlands State University
spellingShingle Solar radiation, Bristow – Campbell, Donatelli – Campbell, Hargreaves, Model Evaluation
Zirebwa, F.S.
Kapenzi, A,
Makuvaro, V.
Sammie, B.
Madanzi, Tendai
An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe
title An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe
title_full An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe
title_fullStr An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe
title_short An evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in Midlands Zimbabwe
title_sort evaluation of the performances and subsequent calibration of three solar radiation estimation models for semi arid climates in midlands zimbabwe
topic Solar radiation, Bristow – Campbell, Donatelli – Campbell, Hargreaves, Model Evaluation
url http://hdl.handle.net/11408/1822
work_keys_str_mv AT zirebwafs anevaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT kapenzia anevaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT makuvarov anevaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT sammieb anevaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT madanzitendai anevaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT zirebwafs evaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT kapenzia evaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT makuvarov evaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT sammieb evaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe
AT madanzitendai evaluationoftheperformancesandsubsequentcalibrationofthreesolarradiationestimationmodelsforsemiaridclimatesinmidlandszimbabwe