Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction?
This paper is based on a research project done in the retail sector in Zimbabwe in the Bulawayo metropolitan province. The research noted that disputes between employees and employers unavoidably arise because of differing class interests. Because of the inevitability of these class disputes between...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
ACCORD
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://accord.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ajcr_2011_3.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1779905259690262528 |
|---|---|
| author | Maitireyi, Pharaoh Duve, Richard |
| author_facet | Maitireyi, Pharaoh Duve, Richard |
| author_sort | Maitireyi, Pharaoh |
| collection | DSpace |
| description | This paper is based on a research project done in the retail sector in Zimbabwe in the Bulawayo metropolitan province. The research noted that disputes between employees and employers unavoidably arise because of differing class interests. Because of the inevitability of these class disputes between labour and capital,
there is need for the state to put in place labour dispute resolution mechanisms that are cost effective and also flexible in terms of procedure and speed. The Zimbabwe Labour Act (28.01), as amended, provides a framework for resolving labour disputes through arbitration. The research sought to investigate the effectiveness of the labour arbitration process in Zimbabwe. The three main criteria for evaluating effectiveness of arbitration, namely accessibility, speed and expertise, were subjected to an empirical test in the Zimbabwean context. The article concludes that the labour arbitration system in Zimbabwe is largely
ineffective due to reasons of prohibitive costs, complexity of procedures and the perceived incompetence of arbitrators. The lack of transparent arbitrator appointment criteria also compromises the arbitration system in Zimbabwe. The research further revealed that, though arbitration can serve a very good purpose as an alternative to costly and lengthy litigation, its effectiveness relies to a great extent on its flexibility and transparency as well as the qualifications, expertise and integrity of the people who preside over it. |
| format | Article |
| id | ir-11408-1247 |
| institution | My University |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | ACCORD |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ir-11408-12472022-06-27T13:49:06Z Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction? Maitireyi, Pharaoh Duve, Richard Labour arbitration, Zimbabwe This paper is based on a research project done in the retail sector in Zimbabwe in the Bulawayo metropolitan province. The research noted that disputes between employees and employers unavoidably arise because of differing class interests. Because of the inevitability of these class disputes between labour and capital, there is need for the state to put in place labour dispute resolution mechanisms that are cost effective and also flexible in terms of procedure and speed. The Zimbabwe Labour Act (28.01), as amended, provides a framework for resolving labour disputes through arbitration. The research sought to investigate the effectiveness of the labour arbitration process in Zimbabwe. The three main criteria for evaluating effectiveness of arbitration, namely accessibility, speed and expertise, were subjected to an empirical test in the Zimbabwean context. The article concludes that the labour arbitration system in Zimbabwe is largely ineffective due to reasons of prohibitive costs, complexity of procedures and the perceived incompetence of arbitrators. The lack of transparent arbitrator appointment criteria also compromises the arbitration system in Zimbabwe. The research further revealed that, though arbitration can serve a very good purpose as an alternative to costly and lengthy litigation, its effectiveness relies to a great extent on its flexibility and transparency as well as the qualifications, expertise and integrity of the people who preside over it. 2016-05-06T16:34:10Z 2016-05-06T16:34:10Z 2011 Article 1562-6997 http://accord.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ajcr_2011_3.pdf en African Journal on Conflict Resolution;Vol. 11, No. 3; p. 135-157 open ACCORD |
| spellingShingle | Labour arbitration, Zimbabwe Maitireyi, Pharaoh Duve, Richard Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction? |
| title | Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction? |
| title_full | Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction? |
| title_fullStr | Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction? |
| title_short | Labour arbitration effectiveness in Zimbabwe: fact or fiction? |
| title_sort | labour arbitration effectiveness in zimbabwe: fact or fiction? |
| topic | Labour arbitration, Zimbabwe |
| url | http://accord.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ajcr_2011_3.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maitireyipharaoh labourarbitrationeffectivenessinzimbabwefactorfiction AT duverichard labourarbitrationeffectivenessinzimbabwefactorfiction |