Perceptions on belt marking system in Zimbabwe: a case of Advanced Level Geography Syllabus 9156.
The study investigated the perceptions of examiners and the Geography subject managers on Belt Marking System in Zimbabwe: A Case of Advanced Level Geography (9156 Paper 1 and 2). The study focused on the perceptions of examiners and the Geography subject manager on the implementation the Belt Mar...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Midlands State University
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11408/628 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The study investigated the perceptions of examiners and the Geography subject managers on Belt Marking
System in Zimbabwe: A Case of Advanced Level Geography (9156 Paper 1 and 2). The study focused on
the perceptions of examiners and the Geography subject manager on the implementation the Belt Marking
System since its introduction in 2011. Underpinned by both constructivist and positivist views within a
post-positivist paradigm, the case study employed both quantitative and qualitative techniques to collect
data. The population comprised of the Geography subject manager and one hundred and fifty Advanced
Level Geography examiners. Purposive sampling was employed to select the subject manager and twenty
senior examiners or supervisors (leadership), and stratified random sampling was used to select forty
examiners to be part of the sample. Data were collected using a questionnaire, interviews, participant
observation and document analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics (numbers
(N) and corresponding percentages (%). Qualitative data were analysed by identifying emerging themes
and pattern in the data collected. Findings revealed that team structures employed by Zimbabwe School
Examinations Council in Belt Making System differed from the Traditional Marking System. With belt
marking method a candidate’s script is marked by more than one examiner as opposed one examiner in the
Traditional Marking System, and moderation takes place at more than one level thus enhancing marking
consistency and reliability. The Belt Marking System enhanced team work, speeded up the marking process,
checks the speed of the fast and slow markers, reduces chances of cheating by markers, and keeps examiners on task by its conveyor belt nature. Challenges included that BMS was heavy in terms of time on task, left little room for examiners’ relaxation, and confined examiners. The researchers concluded that the BMS system is a more reliable innovation with more benefits than TMS. |
|---|