Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District
This article examines the inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of tension and conflict over land in Zimbabwe. The land reform programme executed in 2000, with the intention of restoring land to its ‘rightful’ owners (read blacks/Africans), has accentuated this tension...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | research article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor and Francis Group
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5510 https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2022.2032591 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1779905649484759040 |
---|---|
author | Terrence Musanga |
author2 | Department of Languages, Literature and Cultural Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe |
author_facet | Department of Languages, Literature and Cultural Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe Terrence Musanga |
author_sort | Terrence Musanga |
collection | DSpace |
description | This article examines the inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of tension and conflict over land in Zimbabwe. The land reform programme executed in 2000, with the intention of restoring land to its ‘rightful’ owners (read blacks/Africans), has accentuated this tension and conflict. However, ‘black Zimbabweans’, irrespective of the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front’s (ZANU-PF) patriotic history and nationalist rhetoric of ‘sameness’ and ‘oneness’, are not monolithic as they are divided along class, ethnic and gender lines. This division is key in negotiating and accessing national resources such as land as it translates into ‘national cultural’ capital. Ethnic conflict and tension is rife in Zimbabwe and this makes it possible to consider the inter-ethnic dimensions of what it means to be a ‘black Zimbabwean’ and how this inter-ethnicity might have influenced or affected Zimbabwe’s land reform programme. I use the Ndau ethnic group of the Chipinge District as a case study as the majority of the Ndau feel marginalized in the allocation of redistributed A2 farms in Zimbabwe’s Natural Regions 1 and 2 chiefly characterised by dairy and agricultural farming. This marginalization disadvantaged them as it privileged ‘outsiders’ (read ‘other’ ethnic groups in Zimbabwe). |
format | research article |
id | ir-11408-5510 |
institution | My University |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ir-11408-55102023-03-29T09:40:37Z Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District Terrence Musanga Department of Languages, Literature and Cultural Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe Ndau Land reform programme Resource conflict Black Zimbabweans This article examines the inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of tension and conflict over land in Zimbabwe. The land reform programme executed in 2000, with the intention of restoring land to its ‘rightful’ owners (read blacks/Africans), has accentuated this tension and conflict. However, ‘black Zimbabweans’, irrespective of the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front’s (ZANU-PF) patriotic history and nationalist rhetoric of ‘sameness’ and ‘oneness’, are not monolithic as they are divided along class, ethnic and gender lines. This division is key in negotiating and accessing national resources such as land as it translates into ‘national cultural’ capital. Ethnic conflict and tension is rife in Zimbabwe and this makes it possible to consider the inter-ethnic dimensions of what it means to be a ‘black Zimbabwean’ and how this inter-ethnicity might have influenced or affected Zimbabwe’s land reform programme. I use the Ndau ethnic group of the Chipinge District as a case study as the majority of the Ndau feel marginalized in the allocation of redistributed A2 farms in Zimbabwe’s Natural Regions 1 and 2 chiefly characterised by dairy and agricultural farming. This marginalization disadvantaged them as it privileged ‘outsiders’ (read ‘other’ ethnic groups in Zimbabwe). 1 13 2023-03-29T09:40:36Z 2023-03-29T09:40:36Z research article https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5510 https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2022.2032591 en African Identities 1472-5851 open Taylor and Francis Group |
spellingShingle | Ndau Land reform programme Resource conflict Black Zimbabweans Terrence Musanga Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District |
title | Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District |
title_full | Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District |
title_fullStr | Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District |
title_full_unstemmed | Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District |
title_short | Zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘Black Zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of Chipinge District |
title_sort | zimbabwe’s post-2000 land reform programme, inter-ethnic hierarchies among ‘black zimbabweans’ and the potential of resource conflict: the case of chipinge district |
topic | Ndau Land reform programme Resource conflict Black Zimbabweans |
url | https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5510 https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2022.2032591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terrencemusanga zimbabwespost2000landreformprogrammeinterethnichierarchiesamongblackzimbabweansandthepotentialofresourceconflictthecaseofchipingedistrict |