Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties

According to the linguistic intergroup bias (LIB), positive actions of ingroup members are described with more abstract predicates than those of outgroup members, whereas negative actions of ingroup members are described with more concrete predicates than those of outgroup members. The researchers e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chisango, Tadios, Mayekiso, Thokozile
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321200520
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5dae/0ba598dc70fde730dddac57e1361a7935bcc.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3578
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905652357857280
author Chisango, Tadios
Mayekiso, Thokozile
author_facet Chisango, Tadios
Mayekiso, Thokozile
author_sort Chisango, Tadios
collection DSpace
description According to the linguistic intergroup bias (LIB), positive actions of ingroup members are described with more abstract predicates than those of outgroup members, whereas negative actions of ingroup members are described with more concrete predicates than those of outgroup members. The researchers extrapolated the LIB to compound-word names (for example African National Congress) and their acronymic equivalents (for example A.N.C). They theorized that compound-word names are positive abstract terms, thus, suiting description of the ingroup’s positive identity. Besides, their concrete equivalents acronyms can be easily ascribed a negative meaning and, thus, would be suitable for outgroups. Using content and discourse analysis on a sample of nine African political parties, they investigated the hypothesis that people mention a compound-word name of an ingroup more frequently than of outgroups. Results indicated that people use compound-word names more frequently than outgroups. They explained the effect as a form of a linguistic intergroup bias.
format Article
id ir-11408-3578
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-35782022-06-27T13:49:06Z Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties Chisango, Tadios Mayekiso, Thokozile Acronyming bias Movement for Democratic Change Democratic alliance According to the linguistic intergroup bias (LIB), positive actions of ingroup members are described with more abstract predicates than those of outgroup members, whereas negative actions of ingroup members are described with more concrete predicates than those of outgroup members. The researchers extrapolated the LIB to compound-word names (for example African National Congress) and their acronymic equivalents (for example A.N.C). They theorized that compound-word names are positive abstract terms, thus, suiting description of the ingroup’s positive identity. Besides, their concrete equivalents acronyms can be easily ascribed a negative meaning and, thus, would be suitable for outgroups. Using content and discourse analysis on a sample of nine African political parties, they investigated the hypothesis that people mention a compound-word name of an ingroup more frequently than of outgroups. Results indicated that people use compound-word names more frequently than outgroups. They explained the effect as a form of a linguistic intergroup bias. 2019-04-29T07:47:55Z 2019-04-29T07:47:55Z 2014 Article 0021-9916 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321200520 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5dae/0ba598dc70fde730dddac57e1361a7935bcc.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3578 en Journal of Communication;Vol. 5, No. 2: p. 169-180 open Oxford University Press
spellingShingle Acronyming bias
Movement for Democratic Change
Democratic alliance
Chisango, Tadios
Mayekiso, Thokozile
Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties
title Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties
title_full Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties
title_fullStr Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties
title_full_unstemmed Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties
title_short Exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties
title_sort exploring a linguistic intergroup bias on communication of compound-word names and acronyms among political parties
topic Acronyming bias
Movement for Democratic Change
Democratic alliance
url https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321200520
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5dae/0ba598dc70fde730dddac57e1361a7935bcc.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11408/3578
work_keys_str_mv AT chisangotadios exploringalinguisticintergroupbiasoncommunicationofcompoundwordnamesandacronymsamongpoliticalparties
AT mayekisothokozile exploringalinguisticintergroupbiasoncommunicationofcompoundwordnamesandacronymsamongpoliticalparties