The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.

The history of anthropology in Zimbabwe supports Asad's contention that it is a mistake to view the discipline simply as a reflection of colonial ideology. This account documents this history, and in particular the teaching of the discipline at the University of Zimbabwe (UZ). Anthropology bega...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muzvidziwa, Victor N.
Other Authors: #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
Format: text
Language:English
Published: CODESRIA 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11408/1302
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905237473034240
author Muzvidziwa, Victor N.
author2 #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
author_facet #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
Muzvidziwa, Victor N.
author_sort Muzvidziwa, Victor N.
collection DSpace
description The history of anthropology in Zimbabwe supports Asad's contention that it is a mistake to view the discipline simply as a reflection of colonial ideology. This account documents this history, and in particular the teaching of the discipline at the University of Zimbabwe (UZ). Anthropology began to be taught at the University of Zimbabwe whilst it was still a college of the University of London.From the 1950s to the 1970s the discipline was marked by a preoccupation with process over time,and with the active construction of culture and the nature of social change. Ethnographic accounts focused on urban populations, labour migration, rural cash cropping, peasant identities, interventions of state and church organisations, and rural domains. Whilst tending towards the descriptive, there was a deliberate effort to draw conclusions from both qualitative and quantitative data. The strong ethnographic tradition was limited, however, by a weaker theoretical base, a drawback that has characterised the teaching of anthropology up to the present day The post-independence period has witnessed marked changes in emphasis. First, there has been a strong shift towards applied anthropology; second, and more importantly, Zimbabwean anthropologists have been caught up in the broad stream of reflective and critical thought characteristic of the 1980s and 1990s. Themes of power and of meaning cut across the range of studies conducted by Zimbabwean anthropologists since independence. In this chapter I document this history of theorising and engagement. I argue that the teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe has undergone significant changes and shifts without breaking from its past.
format text
id ir-11408-1302
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher CODESRIA
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-13022022-10-15T19:53:57Z The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities. Muzvidziwa, Victor N. #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# Teaching, anthropology, Zimbabwe. The history of anthropology in Zimbabwe supports Asad's contention that it is a mistake to view the discipline simply as a reflection of colonial ideology. This account documents this history, and in particular the teaching of the discipline at the University of Zimbabwe (UZ). Anthropology began to be taught at the University of Zimbabwe whilst it was still a college of the University of London.From the 1950s to the 1970s the discipline was marked by a preoccupation with process over time,and with the active construction of culture and the nature of social change. Ethnographic accounts focused on urban populations, labour migration, rural cash cropping, peasant identities, interventions of state and church organisations, and rural domains. Whilst tending towards the descriptive, there was a deliberate effort to draw conclusions from both qualitative and quantitative data. The strong ethnographic tradition was limited, however, by a weaker theoretical base, a drawback that has characterised the teaching of anthropology up to the present day The post-independence period has witnessed marked changes in emphasis. First, there has been a strong shift towards applied anthropology; second, and more importantly, Zimbabwean anthropologists have been caught up in the broad stream of reflective and critical thought characteristic of the 1980s and 1990s. Themes of power and of meaning cut across the range of studies conducted by Zimbabwean anthropologists since independence. In this chapter I document this history of theorising and engagement. I argue that the teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe has undergone significant changes and shifts without breaking from its past. 2016-05-13T13:15:51Z 2016-05-13T13:15:51Z 2006 text 9781842777626 http://hdl.handle.net/11408/1302 en African anthropologies: history, critique and practice.;p.99-113. open CODESRIA
spellingShingle Teaching, anthropology, Zimbabwe.
Muzvidziwa, Victor N.
The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.
title The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.
title_full The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.
title_fullStr The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.
title_full_unstemmed The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.
title_short The teaching of anthropology in Zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.
title_sort teaching of anthropology in zimbabwe over the past forty years: continuities and discontinuities.
topic Teaching, anthropology, Zimbabwe.
url http://hdl.handle.net/11408/1302
work_keys_str_mv AT muzvidziwavictorn theteachingofanthropologyinzimbabweoverthepastfortyyearscontinuitiesanddiscontinuities
AT muzvidziwavictorn teachingofanthropologyinzimbabweoverthepastfortyyearscontinuitiesanddiscontinuities