Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process

This paper explores through a neoliberal lens the implications of Kruger National Park‟s (KNP) “Commercialisation for conservation process” (hereafter the commercialisation process, for brevity‟s sake) that was launched in 2000. In doing so, the paper answers a clarion call for empirical research i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Recreation Research 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.crr.otago.ac.nz/docs/CRR%20Proceedings%20with%20cover%20(2).pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1779905362055397376
author Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.
author_facet Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.
author_sort Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.
collection DSpace
description This paper explores through a neoliberal lens the implications of Kruger National Park‟s (KNP) “Commercialisation for conservation process” (hereafter the commercialisation process, for brevity‟s sake) that was launched in 2000. In doing so, the paper answers a clarion call for empirical research in this under-researched area of tourism-protected area partnerships in particular (Wilson, Nielsen & Buultjens, 2009) and the broader neoliberalisation of nature literature in general (Castree 2008a, 2008b; Himley, 2008). Note that the paucity of empirical studies of neoliberalisation globally (Heynen, McCarthy, Prudham, & Robbins, 2007) partially accounts for the existing hegemony of neoliberal development orthodox (King, 2009).
format Article
id ir-11408-1063
institution My University
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Centre for Recreation Research
record_format dspace
spelling ir-11408-10632022-06-27T13:49:05Z Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K. Commercialization processes This paper explores through a neoliberal lens the implications of Kruger National Park‟s (KNP) “Commercialisation for conservation process” (hereafter the commercialisation process, for brevity‟s sake) that was launched in 2000. In doing so, the paper answers a clarion call for empirical research in this under-researched area of tourism-protected area partnerships in particular (Wilson, Nielsen & Buultjens, 2009) and the broader neoliberalisation of nature literature in general (Castree 2008a, 2008b; Himley, 2008). Note that the paucity of empirical studies of neoliberalisation globally (Heynen, McCarthy, Prudham, & Robbins, 2007) partially accounts for the existing hegemony of neoliberal development orthodox (King, 2009). 2016-04-26T14:42:42Z 2016-04-26T14:42:42Z 2010 Article http://www.crr.otago.ac.nz/docs/CRR%20Proceedings%20with%20cover%20(2).pdf en Proceedings of the Centre for Recreation Research Symposium: Recreation Values and Natural Areas; open Centre for Recreation Research
spellingShingle Commercialization processes
Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.
Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
title Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
title_full Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
title_fullStr Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
title_full_unstemmed Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
title_short Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
title_sort winners and losers: local perceptions of kruger national park's commercialisation process
topic Commercialization processes
url http://www.crr.otago.ac.nz/docs/CRR%20Proceedings%20with%20cover%20(2).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nyahunzvidzingaik winnersandloserslocalperceptionsofkrugernationalparkscommercialisationprocess